Cancer Treatments

Essiac Tea, is very helpful. There isa Holistic Doctor’s I know of that deal with such types of cancer situations, and has had success. (it may mean a trip to see her).

One is Dr. Lynne Sheppard 352-307-7922

This is what I wrote for someone else, everyone I’ve shown it to found it really helpful, and prior to reading were not aware of quite a lot of the information. Hope it helps you!

Sorry about the length, but I tried to make this as concise as possible. There are probably still a few technical errors, but the general theory of this should be right.

Cells can either be aeorbic or aneorobic, aeorbics use oxygen for their vital processes (ie. glucose+oxygen=water+carbon dioxide), aneorobes avoid it, and instead ferment glucose to get energy.
The human body is aeorobic, and performs better as the concentrations of oxgen are increased. Interestingly, most pathogens are aneorobic, and die when exposed to oxygen. As a result, oxygen is a “perfect medication as it kills “bad things” and heals “good” things, and that idea is the basic concept of all the oxygen therapies in the alternative health circles.
Cancer cells are human cells which switch from aerobic respiration to being fermenting aneorobes. Fermentation requires about 8x as much energy as normal respiration, and as a result the cancer cells require high levels of glucose to survive, and eventually will consume the entire body in order to feed themselves.
It is believed the aneorobic switch occurs because cells originally evolved to exist in an oxygenless environment (4/5 billion years ago), and it still exists within cells. The cancer transformation process can occur from a combination of the following:
cancer favoring environment (ie. lack of oxygen to an area), loss of substances that facilitate normal cell respiration (ie. enzyemes) resulting from a poor diet, chemical/radiological agents that shut down the oxygen system.
Beyond previously detailed, cancer cells have some other interesting properies:
Their metabolism process creates linolic acid, so they thrive in acidic environments.
Cancer cells, being more primitive than normal cells are much weaker and have a lower resistance environmental stress factors before they die.
The following semi related approaches exist to curing cancer:
*Cut the tumor out. This is problematic since they often reoccur, and the environmental factors must be address as well.
*Flood the body with a toxic agent, and have all the cancer cells die before the normal cells since they are weaker (chemotherapy).
*Use a kill vector that only targets cancer cells but not normal cells (oxygen works, as do various ressonance frequencies of energy)
*Boosting the bodies homeostasis, so it can repair itself, as the immune system actively kills cancer cells and the initial disfunctions creating cancer are removed. This is why various things like tai chi can be effective.
*Nutritional therapy. Toxins which shut down the bodies processes are removed from the diet and attempted to be purged from the system. The same is done for things which promote a cancers ideal environment (ie. no sugar, or putting bases in instead of acids). Instead various compounds are added to the body which the body needs, are lacking in the food, and counter the cancer process (such as the blocking of oxygen pathways or ability of cells to respirate). I’m still not sure exactly why, but in processed foods vs. fresh foods, most of the compounds switch from helping prevent the cancer process to promoting it. Some fairly sophisticated diets have been created in this realm which had nearly 100% sucess rates on patients.
*Use preventative medicine to keep the body in a state that it never hits the cancer point.

Out of those methods, none of them have a 100% sucess rate, or gaurentee that a future cancer will not recurr. Cancer is a fairly involved process which utilizes and is affected by numerous systems in the body (most likely why it keeps on occuring), and this lends to numerous approaches existing for solving it. Chemotherapy actually has a lower sucess rate than most of the others, along with the nastiest side effects, yet it is the one modern medicine has chose to embrace. Kinda sad really, and a reflection of the times.

My own personal belief is that multiple healing approaches (lacking negative side effects) should be used at the same time in the hopes that one will fix it (also known as maximizing probablity). This approach has yet to fail from my observations, but scientifically it is flawed since it cannot specifically prove what was the responsible curative agent. Lately I’ve been working the most with the resonance energy frequency approach, and it seems amazing, but I’m hesitant to endorse it as the one shot cure all approach.

Problems with the previously stated:
*I believe that some yet unknown virus could also be influencial in the cancer process, and the previously established hypothesis doesn’t really address it.
*There is some contradictory evidence with free radicals, so I don’t completely know how to work them into this.
*A very strong correlation exists between emotional health and cancer. I know of plenty of cases where someone had a deeprooted psycological issue addressed and their cancer went into remission. This one however is hard to quantify beyond “cancer is often a way of the subconcious trying to commit suicide.”

In personal experience, two relatives I know have gotten cancer. I determined the root cause of one was that she had been wearing a bra for her whole life (yea, strange I know but bras can cause breast cancer by shutting down the lymphatic drainage system). We made her stop wearing bras and used a rife machine on her. Cancer fix. Other person I played around with DMSO and peroxide. It worked, but I’m not sure if the thing would have gone into remission by itself.